Construct validation — Publications

Well-being: The Ultimate Criterion for Organizational Sciences

Tay, L., Batz-Barbarich, C., Yang, LQ. et al. Well-being: the Ultimate Criterion for Organizational Sciences. J Bus Psychol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09908-5

* All, 2023Louis TayOctober 2, 2023Measurement and methodology, Construct validation, Well-being

Conceptualizing "Positive Attributes" Across Psychological Perspectives

Wilson, D., Ng, V., Alonso, N., Jeffrey, A., & Tay, L. (2024). Conceptualizing “positive attributes” across psychological perspectives. Journal of Personality, 00, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12873

* All, 2023Louis TayOctober 2, 2023Measurement and methodology, Construct validation

Why Life Outcomes are Hard to Predict

Liou, G., Bailey, D. H., Baldwin, C. R., Duckworth, A. L., & Tay, L. (2023, July 14). Why Life Outcomes are Hard to Predict. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7q2rx

* All, 2023Louis TayOctober 2, 2023Measurement and methodology, Construct validation

Perspectives on Help-Receiving in the Workplace: Review and Recommendations

Scotney, V.S., Bonner, C. V., & Tay, L. (2023). in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.352

* All, 2023Louis TayMay 26, 2023Measurement and methodology, Construct validation

Character Traits Predict Health and Well-Being beyond Personality

Wilson, D., Ng, V., Foster, J., & Tay, L. (2024). Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2197064

* All, 2024Louis TayMay 16, 2023Well-being, Construct validation

Development and validation of the Mechanisms of Engagement in the Arts and Humanities scales

Thapa, S., Vaziri, H., Shim, Y., Tay, L., & Pawelski, J. O. (2023). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000556

* All, 2023Louis TayApril 10, 2023Construct validation, Measurement and methodology, Taxonomy

Behavioral measures of humility: Part 2. Conceptual mapping and charting ways forward

Van Tongeren, D. R., Ng, V., Hickman, L., & Tay, L. (2022). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2109201

* All, 2021Louis TaySeptember 16, 2022Well-being, Measurement and methodology, Construct validation

Behavioral measures of humility: Part 1. Theoretical and methodological review

Van Tongeren, D. R., Ng, V., Hickman, L., & Tay, L. (2022). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2109202

* All, 2021Louis TaySeptember 16, 2022Well-being, Measurement and methodology, Construct validation

Developing and evaluating language-based machine learning algorithms for inferring applicant personality in video interviews

Hickman, L., Saef, R., Ng, V., Woo, S. E., Tay, L., & Bosch, N. (2021). Human Resource Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12356

Automated Video Interview Personality Assessments: Reliability, Validity, and Generalizability Investigations

Hickman, L., Bosch, N., Ng, V., Saef, R., Tay, L., & Woo, S. E. (2021). Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000695

Examining the Item Response Process to Personality Measures in High-Stakes Situations: Issues of Measurement Validity and Predictive Validity

Zhang, B., Cao, M., Tay, L. Luo, J., & Drasgow, F. (2020). Personnel Psychology, 73, 305-332.

2020, * AllScienceSitesOctober 4, 2020Construct validation

Establishing Construct Continua in Construct Validation: The Process of Continuum Specification

Tay, L. & Jebb, A. (2018). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 375-388.

2018, * AllScienceSitesOctober 4, 2020Construct validation

Aristotle’s Golden Mean and the Importance of Bipolarity for Personality Models: A Commentary on “Personality Traits and Maladaptivity: Unipolarity vs. Bipolarity”

Samuel, D.B., & Tay, L. (2018). Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1097-1102.

2018, * AllScienceSitesOctober 4, 2020Construct validation

Detecting Curvilinear Relationships: A Comparison of Scoring Approaches Based on Different Item Response Models

Cao, M., Song, C., & Tay, L. (2018). International Journal of Testing, 178-205.

2018, * AllScienceSitesOctober 4, 2020Construct validation

A Within-Person Examination of the Ideal Point Response Process

LaPalme, M., Tay, L., & Wang, W. (2018). Psychological Assessment, 30, 567-581.

2018, * AllScienceSitesOctober 4, 2020Construct validation

Why Self-Reports of Happiness and Sadness May Not Necessarily Contradict Bipolarity: A Psychometric Review and Proposal

Tay, L., & Kuykendall, L. (2017). Emotion Review, 9, 146-154.

2017, * AllScienceSitesOctober 4, 2020Construct validation

Detecting Differential Item Functioning of Polytomous Items for an Ideal Point Response Process

Wang, W., Tay, L., & Drasgow, F. (2013). Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 316-335.

2013, * AllScienceSitesOctober 3, 2020Construct validation

Theoretical, Statistical, and Substantive Issues in the Assessment of Construct Dimensionality: Accounting for the Item Response Process

Tay, L., & Drasgow, F. (2012). Organizational Research Methods, 15, 363-384.

2012, * AllScienceSitesOctober 3, 2020Construct validation

Fitting IRT Models to Dichotomous and Polytomous Data: Assessing the Relative Model-Data Fit of Ideal Point and Dominance Models

Tay, L., Ali, U.S., Drasgow, F. & Williams, B.A. (2011). Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 280-295.

2011, * AllScienceSitesOctober 3, 2020Construct validation

Fitting Ideal-Point Models to Vocational Interest Data: Are Dominance Models Ideal?

Tay, L., Williams, B.A., Drasgow, F., & Rounds, J. (2009). Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1287-1304.

2009, * AllScienceSitesOctober 3, 2020Construct validation

Publications

Well-Being and Measurement Lab